richmangalleries.com

art thoughts -- a peripatetic blog

Tirolerhof Cafe     

Interiors
 
     Photographing the interior of a cafe or tavern can evoke a particular mood.  Some are crowded, some not; people may be solitary, in twos or larger groups.  Some interiors are intimate, some closed-in, and still others more spacious and area.  Each, though, has its own atmosphere.  We seek refuge in such places.  We look for comfort, for familiarity, for the ease of conversation and companionship, even if to exchange a word with a server, and contemplate our existence.  These are places of respite.  Or are they? Are they, perhaps, a  kind of purgatory, a no-mans land that is less respite than just another battleground in the struggle for survival?  I present two of my own, from Vienna, for comparison with three paintings--two late nineteenth century European impressionistic paintings and one mid-twentieth century realist American.  To the right is the Tirolerhof Cafe.  A lone woman reads at the near right corner; a waitress attends a group at the back.  Couples converse.  There is significant space between them, yet all are in this same place, sharing a set of moments.  They remain strangers.  All seem comfortable within their own thoughts and conversations.  Cafe CentralBelow left is Cafe Central, also with a solitary figure in the foreground.  The setting is more elaborate and conveys a sense of well-being.  These are places of comfort.. 

 

     On the other hand, shown here for purposes of comment, are three paintings that evoke atmospheres of estrangement and tension.  In the Philadelphia Museum of Art are Peter Severin Kroyer's "Interior of a Tavern," Interior of a Tavernpainted in 1886 (left), and Santiago Rusinol's "Interior of a Cafe," from 1892 (below).  Kroyer's interior Interior of a Cafefeatures more of a crowd, although one man remains alone, with his aquavit and his thoughts.  The interior space is tighter, the figures closer together, but for me, there is more a pervading sense of isolation than companionship.  In Rusinol's cafe, each figure is alone.  Some are glimpsed only in part; the two women are more clearly seen, and the man at the table, framed through the door, is also generally realized.  None seem engaged with the other.  The Philadelphia Art Museum catalog suggests the foremost figure is a prostitute "far gone in drink."

 

     One of the most iconic interiors was actually painted from an exterior view but nonetheless conveys the ultimate sense of estrangement.  NighthawksThis is, of course, Edward Hopper's "Nighthawks," in the Art Institute of Chicago.  The presumptive couple are disengaged from each other as well as the counterman and a stranger with his back to us.  We are all photographers, all voyeurs, with their thoughts reflecting back on us.  IN the others, we are inside; in Hopper's painting we are a step removed, a more objective observer, perhaps, increasing the sense of alienation.  We are passing by on the street outside; an ostensibly welcoming light proves anything but as it reveals the intensity and isolation of existence.       

 

September 2009

 

 




BLOG ARCHIVES:  July 2009     August 2009     December 2009

Home    Gallery Guide     News     Contact     Links     Stock Image Categories     About the Photographer     Main Art Blog Page